May’s Government won the vote on making war without Parliament’s consent with or without evidence to support it

Hypoxia Vs Chemical Attack

Facts Vs Hysteria with intent.

ParliamentAmidst zoo like scenes of disorder the May Government won a vote 317 to 256 upholding its right to wage war without consulting parliament. That has to change but it is difficult with such a weak and ineffective opposition unable to establish a cross party consensus against the governing executive.

At the very moment of May’s victory for autocracy over democracy in the Palace of Westminster; a May trait which is becoming ever more prominent as time passes, the first reliable reports on the ground in Syria are pointing to Hypoxia as the cause of the US, UK and French ‘chemical attack’ panic and hysteria. Hypoxia happens when all oxygen is sucked out of the air by bombs. This could well have occurred during a high enough concentration of conventional bombs being dropped in the same place at the same time.

If Hypoxia or dense clouds of choking dust are found to be the cause of the ‘chemical attack’ May’s Government will be guilty of a precipitate, unjustified, irresponsible rush to a war which a consultation with cooler wiser heads in Parliament would have prevented. We can count ourselves lucky, for the time being, we are not yet going into World war three.

As things stand if I were to sit in a jury on the May governments decision to commit the UK to an act of war without evidence I would convict them guilty as charged. Their actions undermine our whole system of civil and criminal justice. As evidence mounts that there never was any chemical attack one has to wonder at the competence and intent of our Government; our intelligence and security services, and a system which allows social media to underpin and govern their actions.

Part 1 – Corbyn was right to ask the questions about the rights of Parliament to control its executive if the executive chooses to war without evidence to support its actions.

Part 2 – Now we as a nation have to decide what we do with May’s government and the security services if there was no chemical attack.

Part 3 – Change

Please read: The Canary: A reporter finally entered the ‘chemical attack’ site in Syria. What he found is extraordinary.

Award winning journalist Robert Fisk visits ‘chemical attack’ site

Theresa May Has Started a War Without A UN Mandate Or In Defense Of The Realm

blair

 

The Chilcott enquiry should have been the pre-cursor to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and others being prosecuted as war criminals. The whole case broke down because the UK Parliament voted not to go ahead with the case.

“Labour MPs turned out in force on Wednesday to help defeat a parliamentary motion calling for Tony Blair to be held to account for allegedly misleading parliament over the Iraq war by 439 votes to 70, after a sometimes angry debate.” – The Guardian, 30th Nov 2016

Its the same in the US. Despite all the evidence indicating the Bush administration at the time and the present Trump administration were and are acting outside International law means our systems of government have broken down. The executives of Britain, France and the US have become detached from democratic accountability.

The attack on Syria was a brazen show of contempt for the ability of our national and international court systems to take action. Indeed our governments appear to have stepped outside the rule of law. Presuming guilt before the evidence can prove it is so.

The failure to prosecute the Blair and Bush governments for war crimes has emboldened the political and military leadership responsible to believe they can do anything they want without reaction or consequence.

In Britain’s case our MP’s are demonstrably no longer defending the rule of law and holding our government to account therefore the people must democraticaly get rid of them at the first available opportunity. The elites in all main political parties in all countries seem to have created some sort of club which is operating policies independent of, and against the interests of the people who elected them. This has to stop.

I am recommending that Conservative and Labour voters seek out alternatives. I have chosen the following parties as a realistic means of doing just that. As Anne-Marie Waters of the For Britain party states “you cannot reform them we the people have to get rid of them.”

This is a fight for democracy and the rule of law please consider joining it for the sake of future generations.

The Democrats and Veterans Party dandv_logo_150
The For Britain Party FB_Profile-MarkLogo_150
The National Health Action Party

Free War Zones – Without Rules or Democracy and Under The Rule Of Non-Law

charge_overchargeTheresa May whipping up a storm of sanctions against Russia around the world over the Skripal case, saying it was “likely” that Russia was behind it, quite frankly was an embarassment. There was no fact based evidence the Russians were behind it. Don’t get me wrong it may be that Scotland Yard can provide evidence in future but to go around demanding sanctions without the international courts and investigators getting involved is just plain dangerous, hysterical and hot-headed. Pretext is the word that sprang to the front of mind closely followed by the phrase Kangaroo court.

Read also: Zero Hedge: Former UK Ambassador to Syria: Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Was STAGED By Islamic Jihadi Propagandists, No One Actually Died

Continue reading

UK Passport Sellout Accurately Summarises May’s Conservative Sellout To EU

EU flag burnNothing illustrates the Conservative Government’s treachery and unpatriotic wrongheadedness over Brexit more succinctly than May’s government asking the French and Dutch to make Britain’s passports. The Conservatives have no shame, they have no national pride and they are a disgrace to the office they hold on our behalf.

Whoever and whatever Theresa May is she is not a Conservative as I understand the term. She has caved in on immigration, law, and trade it looks as though she is laying the foundations for a quick return to the EU after she and her party have been booted out at the next election.

I watched Theresa May, post capitulation, at the EU Summit being kissed and held by Jean-Claude Juncker as if she was a hero returning home. And for the EU indeed she and her ‘Brexit team’ are their heros. Theresa May and George Davis have publicly surrendered the country to national humiliation and disgrace.

Edward Heath and his government at least had enough sense of shame to keep his treachery secret when he took us in. May and her cabinet have no shame and have determined TO SUBORDINATE THE UK to the EU against the will of the people.

This has not been a negotiation this has been a choreographed capitulation.

May Guilty Of Rush To Judgement Overriding International Law and Procedure

TM

What is May up to?

Reluctantly I had to agree with Jeremy Corbyn’s response to Theresa May’s statement on Russia. The press regard his response as tepid because he simply did not fall into line with the narrative being fed to parliament and the general public. Several things came to mind which raise disquiet, more so the longer you think about them.

Call me cynical but now would be a good time to keep your eye on Brexit negotiations. A fantastic opportunity for May and Hammond to bury their capitulation to the EU.

******

Here is the Global establishment elite pronouncing judgement before guilt is established. Stunningly anti-democratic demagoguery reminiscent of McArthyism in 50s U.S.A.

Telegraph: France, Germany, US and UK issue joint statement blaming Russia for Salisbury attack as Moscow vows to expel British diplomats

Continue reading

Corbyn Has A Point – Privatisation Is Not A Panacea Or A Religious Faith Based Doctrine

Private finance initiatives (PFIs) have proven themselves to be one of the most disgustingly transparent transfers of wealth from the poor to the rich ever devised by successive Labour AND Conservative governments. It is a bankrupt, sleaze generating and anti-democratic policy damaging the fabric of our society. It has to be stopped.

If supporting the abolition of PFIs makes me a ‘Socialist’ in this matter then so be it. As an independent conservative (with a small c) I can see the common sense in Mr Corbyn’s argument.

It is a warning to the Conservative government that many small c conservatives feel the same way. We are well aware of the Hunt actioned dismemberment of the NHS amongst others. BE AWARE.

“Labour leader urges councils to reverse privatisation of public services while defending party’s intervention in Haringey”

Descent Into Treason – The Last Post

TMSack May and Hammond

They have sold the people out.

Taxpayers pay the extortion/divorce bill – EU banks and corporations reap the profits – UK Sovereignty and democracy sold down the river to EU Dictators. This is treachery.

Now we know what May meant by “Brexit means Brexit”

 Brexit in name only and betrayal.

It is becoming increasingly obvious the Conservative Brexit Plan was to get out in front of the Leave movement with the likes of Boris Johnson and the ‘take back control’ crew then mislead it back into the Dictatorial EU fold with Hammond and May in the vanguard.

Like many who supported UKIP in the past I cannot see any future for the Party without the radical, campaigning Farage at its helm. Farage made the terrible mistake of agreeing to resign the leadership at the behest of the then party chairman Steve Crowther and his poor thinking immediately after the referendum. It was too soon and led to the tragic and now terminal decline of the party.

We tried to warn the country, young and old, that our nations sovereignty, freedom and democracy were at stake. We nearly succeeded but the actions of Farage, May, Hammond and Johnson have compounded the treachery of McMillan, Heath, Wilson, Major, Blair, Brown and Cameron.

The next generation will it seems have to sacrifice on a terrible scale in the not too distant future, to learn the hard lessons of the past, and to regain the freedoms so easily spirited away by traitors to foreign powers over generations without the consent of the British People.

The descent into Treason

“Clause 49 states that there will be regulatory alignment across the whole of the UK economy for an unspecified period. This would mean that Britain would be unable to adjust its laws and negotiate trade deals with the rest of the world, which are important economic benefits of Brexit. Albeit this is related to the Irish question, it could easily be a Trojan horse for a neverendum and would result in the UK having a deal worse than that of Norway. –  Leave Means Leave

The Whole Objective Of EU Negotiating Position Is Delay and Defeat of Brexit

Its Time To Walk Away From A Bad “Deal”

eu_dictatorship

  • Current Impasse should surprise no-one
  • British law should be sovereign in Britain. For Davis to even consider Barnier’s demand for ECJ primacy over Westminster, in any case, should be dismissed out of hand. Its an outrage.
  • Building delay and obfuscation into negotiations is the whole point of the EU position. It is a classic EU tactic based on the principle if you cannot get what you want now some pliant idiots will come along later, years later,  and can be corrupted into giving in. Hence the Blair, Cable, Soros, Branson, Corporatist(Hammond) and Banker Carney’s  Remain position
  • The anti-democratic nature of the EU makes Juncker and the EU ‘team’ unsackable, ideologically driven and arrogant.
  • Sadly Prime Minister May and her carefully selected Remain clique in cabinet are too close to the EU elite. They need to obtain an objective detachment from the EU’s institutions. That is being kind. You could be unkind and say she and Hammond are working for the EU and not the British people and they seek delay and obfuscation too on behalf of big business.
  • Many believe British sovereignty has been kidnapped by pre-meditated EU deceit and that May and her cabinet have the mentality of a kidnap victim assuming sympathy and alignment with its captors. A well understood kidnapping syndrome
  • The EU Commission is a proxy for Franco-German policy making and overlordship over EU states

The EU Don’t Like Doing It In Public: Sneaky Stealth and Arrogant Extortion Is Their Preferred Option

PN-172_2The Brussels Commission, EUrocrats and negotiators find it difficult to have their methods, views, techniques and prejudices arrayed for the whole world to see. All their secret schemes, quietly nurtured in committtee rooms populated by carefully selected EU-phile politicians over the EU’s lifetime up for public discussion is not their preference, but here we are.

The British have forced the EU’s hidden agenda for a militarised EU Superstate governed by a Soviet style commission beyond the reach of democracy into full public view and they hate it.

Continue reading

The Brexit Battle Is Only Just Starting

WHOISSABOTEURMay and Hammond following EU strategy to:

  • Allow EU Superstate laws to go on governing us
  • Let immigrants legal and illegal overwhelm us
  • Be ruled by laws handed down to us by people we never voted for
  • Keep the EU’s hands in our pockets for a very long time

The EU’s modus operandi when dealing with democracy is to ignore it wherever possible if it conflicts with the aims and objectives of achieving an EU superstate. Now it seems Hammond and May, and I see it in that order, have decided that the EU way of doing things, which will ultimately lead the UK back into the arms of the EU superstate, is the  way to go. Delay, fudge and delay again until we hold a second referendum be it in the guise of a snap general election.

This is not what we voted for. This would be a betrayal.

Continue reading